Paul Stanton, government mole?


Libertarian Senate Candidate Paul Stanton has only been a resident of Florida for 9 months, as near as I can tell. No one in the Libertarian party, that I’ve been able to find, has ever heard of him before he came to Florida. According to Mr. Stanton himself, “he was born in Oklahoma and spent parts of his childhood in Arizona, Illinois and then finally in Fort Wayne, Indiana—where he graduated high school”

Frankly, I find it suspicious when someone moves to a state then almost immediately decides they want to represent that state on a national level. Think, Hillary moving to NYC and running for Senate almost immediately after. I also find it suspicious when military officers leave the service to immediately join activist organizations.   Think Timothy McVeigh, who like Paul Stanton obtained the rank of Sergeant before “leaving the military” to join a variety of nationalist groups.

Additionally, Stanton doesn’t seem to have any connections to any other political party prior to November of 2015.

Paul’s been “cloak and dagger” about his fairytale- background and  refuses to even debate his opponent. I’m willing to admit that there could be a reasonable and clear explanation for this, and I would like to hear it.

However, in my humble opinion, we should seriously consider that Paul Stanton is a part of the government’s effort to infiltrate and keep tabs on third parties. I could be wrong, but  It is public knowledge that the government considers Libertarianism a gateway to domestic terrorism.

To Paul, I have three questions:

1. Why are you running for senate in Florida, as opposed to Indiana, Oklahoma, Arizona, or Illinois?

2. Why are you running for senate as opposed to congress or a local seat? Florida senate is one of the only contested libertarian primaries in the nation.

3. Are you— or the government— attempting to subvert  Augustus Invictus, your nationally known primary opponent who  openly calls for a revolution against our government?

If you have any information or other alleged informants, please reach out. Stay tuned for a follow-up.

4 responses to “Paul Stanton, government mole?

  1. This is HILARIOUS. Thanks for the laugh.


  2. Did you miss where he sued an airport for his right to protest the TSA?

    Literally the only thing anyone knew about Augustus Invictus prior to his coming to the party was that he lost it a few years back and wrote a fairly threatening open letter about renouncing everything in the world and coming back bearing war. He was never active with a political party prior to his coming to the LP to run for Senate. Since you like conspiracies, how about this one?

    Augustus Invictus is a government mole sent in to discredit the Libertarian Party by advocating for violent war which turns off the majority of Americans.

    Do I actually believe this? Of course not. But it has just as much evidence behind it as your little theory.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Expert article! I have no idea why anyone with a military history would have lived in multiple locations. It’s not like they move them around or anything!


  4. Thane Eichenauer

    Tommy Frain> Augustus Invictus is a government mole sent in to discredit the Libertarian Party by advocating for violent war which turns off the majority of Americans.

    The same Americans that celebrate a holiday commemorating a violent war against the rule of the British government. Those Americans?

    I deplore those that would label either Augustus Invictus or his opponent as a rat, snitch or an informant. Both of them have put in hard labor to promote the ideas of the Libertarian Party.

    Neither Augustus Invictus nor his opponent need justify his choice to live and run for office in Florida, nor the office he chose to run for. What tactics Paul Stanton uses or fails to use are up to him. Let him be judged by his choices. Judge likewise the choices of Augustus Invictus.

    Marco Rubio has been a player in the bomb Muslim countries X, Y and Z coalition since his election. Either Stanton or Invictus would be a vast improvement over Rubio if either of them were to be elected.

    I personally think it is a bad idea to avoid debates with your primary opponent but I don’t get to make Paul Stanton’s choices for him. He decides his own strategy.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s